The Federal Employee Briefing for July 1, 2025
Brought to you by Southworth PC—Attorneys for Federal Employees
Our online community now tops 150,000 federal workers and supporters across TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, and LinkedIn. Each briefing distills the day’s most consequential developments, adds clear-eyed legal analysis, and pairs it with mindfulness tools that keep you steady no matter how turbulent the news cycle becomes. If this newsletter helps you stay informed, please pass it on: https://fedlegalhelp.com/newsletter. Your advocacy broadens the protective circle for every federal employee.
Top Three News Stories:
1. NOAA Signals 17 Percent Workforce Reduction for FY 2026
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s newly released fiscal-2026 congressional justification, dated June 30, lays out a plan to shrink its payroll from about 12,000 to 10,000 full-time employees—a 17 percent cut—while eliminating Oceanic and Atmospheric Research and transferring some Endangered Species Act duties to Interior’s Fish and Wildlife Service. The document follows February terminations of roughly 800 probationary staff who were briefly reinstated, then fired again; a class-action suit filed June 30 alleges NOAA relied on inaccurate performance data in those actions. The agency says a leaner structure and $1.8 billion budget reduction will “refocus on core operational needs” such as navigation data and weather forecasting. Federal News Network
Legal Insight:
Large-scale reductions trigger the RIF procedures in 5 C.F.R. Part 351, requiring competitive-area definitions, retention registers, and advance notices; failure to follow them could supply grounds for MSPB appeals even for employees outside conventional RIFs. Probationary employees generally lack full appeal rights, but the pending lawsuit argues their removals violated the Privacy Act by using erroneous records—an avenue that, if successful, could extend to thousands more terminations.
2. House Bill Would Require Senior Feds to Pass Annual Appropriations-Law Training
Introduced June 30 by Rep. Marcy Kaptur, the Appropriations Compliance and Training Act (H.R. 4230) mandates that all federal employees at GS-11 or above complete certified instruction on the Antideficiency Act, the Impoundment Control Act, and related fiscal statutes each year. Agency heads must report completions to OMB; officials who miss the 45-day window would be barred from financial decision-making, lose performance bonuses, and eventually lose network access until compliance. Kaptur framed the measure as a response to recent “pocket rescission” threats and other executive-branch moves to withhold congressionally directed funds. Government Executive
Legal Insight:
If passed, suspension from IT systems could implicate due-process rights if it effectively places employees in nonduty status without pay; agencies would need to provide notice and an opportunity to respond. Mandated reporting to OMB tightens oversight of Antideficiency Act violations, potentially increasing referrals to the Justice Department for willful infractions. Contractors who provide fiscal services may, if this is passed, see new clause requirements ensuring that embedded federal staff meet the training threshold.
3. Court Again Blocks Executive Order Stripping Union Rights
Last week, U.S. District Judge James Donato issued a 29-page preliminary injunction, publicized June 30, that halts enforcement of President Trump’s March executive order eliminating collective-bargaining rights for roughly two-thirds of federal employees. Finding “persuasive evidence” of First Amendment retaliation, the court rejected Justice Department arguments that the dispute should go to the Federal Labor Relations Authority and emphasized that national-security claims do not automatically override constitutional protections. Agencies had already begun canceling dues deductions and walking away from grievance procedures; the injunction restores the status quo while litigation proceeds. Government Executive
Legal Insight:
The order re-establishes statutory labor rights under 5 U.S.C. Chapter 71, requiring agencies to honor existing contracts and resume bargaining or face contempt. Because the ruling hinges on retaliatory motive, any renewed attempt to curtail union activity must survive strict scrutiny of intent; discovery could expose internal communications, so agencies should preserve records. Employees disciplined during the EO’s brief life span may file ULP charges arguing that any adverse actions were tainted by an unlawful policy if otherwise appropriate. The injunction also limits management’s ability to declare whole agencies “national-security” entities exempt from bargaining without detailed factual support, a precedent likely to influence future FLRA and appellate review.
Mindful Moment of the Day:
“Walk-the-Block” Microbreaks
Your fifteen-minute union break is legally protected—turn it into a moving meditation that also protects your eyesight and mood. Step outside, silence your phone, and keep attention glued to the pure mechanics of walking: heel strike, roll, toe-off, the breeze around the ears. Research from the Office of Personnel Management’s wellness initiative shows that a short, mindful loop around the building restores prefrontal blood flow, undoing the cognitive drain of nonstop screen work by nearly thirty percent. When you return to your cube or telework setup, the spreadsheet columns feel sharper, and the next stakeholder call lands on a calmer, more present mind. Over time, these microbreaks compound like TSP contributions—small deposits that yield huge dividends in focus and resilience.
Legal Tip of the Day:
Keep Contemporaneous Notes
Federal judges and the MSPB give greater weight to notes made close in time to the event they describe. Use a bound notebook or date‑stamped digital entry to log key conversations, instructions, and any remarks you find questionable. Include who was present, the gist of the exchange, and how it affected your work. These small records often tip the balance when memories fade years later.
Important Announcement: New RIF Appeal Resources Now Available
Before we dive into today's briefing, we want to quickly highlight new resources we've created specifically for federal employees facing Reduction-in-Force (RIF) actions. Given the challenging situation many federal workers now face, we've developed three tailored options to help you successfully appeal your RIF before the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB):
-
DIY Online Course (Bronze Level): Step-by-step video modules, proven templates, and strategic guidance to help you confidently file your own MSPB appeal. $199.
👉 Reserve Your Spot (No Payment Required Today) -
DIY Course + One-on-One Strategy Sessions (Silver Level): After enrolling in the DIY course, schedule private strategy sessions ($350/hour, up to three sessions) to personalize the course materials to your specific case.
-
Full Attorney Representation (Gold Level): Professional legal advocacy for high-stakes RIF cases, beginning with a confidential consultation ($350) to outline your strongest arguments and next steps. Retainers start at $5,000.
👉 Schedule Your RIF Strategy Consult
We designed these solutions to empower you—regardless of your budget or your case's complexity. Take action today to protect your federal career and future.
In Case You Missed It:
Live Q&A — Saturday, 11 a.m. ET
Bring your toughest workplace questions to our interactive coaching call. Free three-day trial, $19/month thereafter, cancel anytime. Members receive replays, written takeaways, and mindfulness drills that translate legal theory into daily practice. Reserve your seat: https://fedlegalhelp.com/join
Deep-Dive Courses for When the Stakes Are Personal
Navigating Reasonable Accommodations: Maximize Telework
$199 USD
Request accommodations confidently with step-by-step videos, professional templates, and mindfulness tools.
👉 Buy Now
Federal Employee RIF Masterclass: Protect Your Future
$199 USD
Secure your career during a Reduction in Force (RIF) with clear video lessons, actionable checklists, and stress-management techniques.
👉 Enroll Today
Need Personalized Advice?
A federal job moves fast—and so do the deadlines to fight discrimination, retaliation, potential discipline, or a removal. If you are interested in seeing if we can help you, one short, confidential call with Southworth PC might be able to help. The consultation is free, you speak with an attorney (not a screener), and our hybrid-retainer model caps your up-front costs until we win or settle.
We litigate before the EEOC, MSPB, and OSC nationwide, drawing on decades of inside knowledge of agency tactics. Protect your rights before the next deadline closes.
👉 Schedule Your Free Consultation Today
|
Disclaimer:
This newsletter is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. Southworth PC provides these insights to help federal employees better understand their rights and navigate workplace developments, but every situation is unique. If you are facing a specific employment issue, you should consult a qualified attorney to discuss the facts of your case. While we aim to ensure the accuracy of legal interpretations at the time of publication, changes in law or policy may affect how the information applies to your circumstances. We’re proud to stand with federal employees—and we’re here when it matters most.
Responses