The Federal Employee Briefing for June 13, 2025
Brought to you by Southworth PCâAttorneys for Federal Employees
Our online community now tops 150,000 federal workers and supporters across TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, and LinkedIn. Each briefing distills the dayâs most consequential developments, adds clear-eyed legal analysis, and pairs it with mindfulness tools that keep you steady no matter how turbulent the news cycle becomes. If this newsletter helps you stay informed, please pass it on: https://fedlegalhelp.com/newsletter. Your advocacy broadens the protective circle for every federal employee.
Top Three News Stories:
1. White House Moves to Freeze $30 Billion in Agency Funds
Reporting in POLITICO details a new OMB directive, delivered mostly by phone, ordering EPA, NASA, NSF and a dozen other agencies to âpauseâ more than $30 billion in unobligated balances while the administration prepares a broad âdeferralsâ package under the Impoundment Control Act. Budget officials say the gambit is designed to make the cuts permanent if Congress fails to act, effectively testing the limits of the presidentâs power of the purse. Critics warn the freeze undermines constitutional checks and could land at the Supreme Court. Politico
Legal Insight:
Any âverbalâ freeze could lack the paper trail the ICA requires. If you manage funds, csonider asking for a written order that cites the specific ICA provision (deferral or rescission) and start a contemporaneous log of impacts; those records are critical if GAO or Congress investigates. Remember that spending money after a valid freeze can violate the Anti-Deficiency Act, but so can withholding money unlawfullyâso documenting conflicting instructions protects you either way. Finally, whistleblower protections (5 U.S.C. § 2302) cover disclosures about illegal budget moves, and OSC can stay personnel actions taken in retaliation.
2. House Passes $9.4 B Rescissions Bill Targeting Foreign Aid & Public Media
In a 214-212 vote, the House approved the Rescissions Act of 2025, clawing back $9.4 billion previously appropriated for foreign assistance, global health, and nearly $1.1 billion for NPR/PBS. The measure would codify some Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cuts and now heads to the Senate, where GOP leaders hint at changes next month. Four Republican members joined all Democrats in opposition, citing rural broadcasting impacts. GovExec
Legal Insight:
Until the Senate acts, agencies should keep obligating funds per current lawârescissions are not final until enacted. Budget or grants staff who receive instructions to halt spending should request written confirmation that an enacted rescission exists; otherwise, withholding may breach the Anti-Deficiency Act and ICA. Program managers should also preserve documentation of cancellation costs. Remember that abrupt grant shutdowns can also trigger bid-protest or Contract Disputes Act claims, so involve counsel early and keep contractor communications in writing.
3. Education Department Asks 1,400 Fired Employees to Come Back After Court Order
Federal News Network reports that on June 12 the Education Department emailed nearly 1,400 employees it laid off in March, asking if they are âstill availableâ for reinstatement. The outreach follows a May 22 federal injunction requiring the agency to reverse a workforce cut Judge Myong Joun said would cause âirreparable harmâ to students. HR officials say responses will help plan return dates and accommodations; the administration still seeks to dismantle most of the department. Federal News Network
Legal Insight:
Reinstated employees are likely entitled to back pay, service credit, and restored leave under the Back Pay Act (5 U.S.C. § 5596). If management proposes a lower grade, duty station, or break in benefits, insist on a written offer and consult your union or an MSPB practitioner before accepting. Those who took âvoluntaryâ buyouts or early-outs should check whether returning could trigger debt-collection; agencies could waive repayment when separations are later ruled improper. Keep all correspondenceâthe court may ultimately award attorney fees and interest, and your documentation proves eligibility.
Mindful Moment of the Day:
Body-Scan Before Brief Writing
Tight shoulders and shallow breaths siphon oxygen from the very frontal lobes you need to craft a watertight MSPB brief. Before typing a word, close your eyes, feel the soles on the floor, and trace a slow scan upwardâankles, knees, hips, spine, jawâsoftening each checkpoint on a five-count exhale. Somatic quieting steadies heart-rate variability, opening an alpha-wave window associated with sharper reasoning and cleaner prose. Ninety seconds of scanning saves thirty minutes of post-draft editing, and opposing counsel will wonder where the brain fog went.
Legal Tip of the Day:
Telework Agreements Are Contracts
A signed telework agreement outlines expectations, equipment responsibilities, and recall provisions. Changesâsuch as rescinding teleworkâgenerally require notice and, for bargainingâunit employees, may trigger a duty to bargain. Keep a copy of your agreement; it is evidence if management later calls you âAWOLâ for following its terms. Consistency is your strongest defense.
Important Announcement: New RIF Appeal Resources Now Available
Before we dive into today's briefing, we want to quickly highlight new resources we've created specifically for federal employees facing Reduction-in-Force (RIF) actions. Given the challenging situation many federal workers now face, we've developed three tailored options to help you successfully appeal your RIF before the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB):
-
DIY Online Course (Bronze Level): Step-by-step video modules, proven templates, and strategic guidance to help you confidently file your own MSPB appeal. $199.
đ Reserve Your Spot (No Payment Required Today) -
DIY Course + One-on-One Strategy Sessions (Silver Level): After enrolling in the DIY course, schedule private strategy sessions ($350/hour, up to three sessions) to personalize the course materials to your specific case.
-
Full Attorney Representation (Gold Level): Professional legal advocacy for high-stakes RIF cases, beginning with a confidential consultation ($350) to outline your strongest arguments and next steps. Retainers start at $5,000.
đ Schedule Your RIF Strategy Consult
We designed these solutions to empower youâregardless of your budget or your case's complexity. Take action today to protect your federal career and future.
In Case You Missed It:
Today on the blog we unpack:
Live Q&A â Saturday, 11 a.m. ET
Bring your toughest workplace questions to our interactive coaching call. Free three-day trial, $19/month thereafter, cancel anytime. Members receive replays, written takeaways, and mindfulness drills that translate legal theory into daily practice. Reserve your seat: https://fedlegalhelp.com/join
Deep-Dive Courses for When the Stakes Are Personal
Navigating Reasonable Accommodations: Maximize Telework
$199 USD
Request accommodations confidently with step-by-step videos, professional templates, and mindfulness tools.
đ Buy Now
Federal Employee RIF Masterclass: Protect Your Future
$199 USD
Secure your career during a Reduction in Force (RIF) with clear video lessons, actionable checklists, and stress-management techniques.
đ Enroll Today
Need Personalized Advice?
A federal job moves fastâand so do the deadlines to fight discrimination, retaliation, potential discipline, or a removal. If you are interested in seeing if we can help you, one short, confidential call with Southworth PC might be able to help. The consultation is free, you speak with an attorney (not a screener), and our hybrid-retainer model caps your up-front costs until we win or settle.
We litigate before the EEOC, MSPB, and OSC nationwide, drawing on decades of inside knowledge of agency tactics. Protect your rights before the next deadline closes.
đ Schedule Your Free Consultation Today
|
Disclaimer:
This newsletter is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. Southworth PC provides these insights to help federal employees better understand their rights and navigate workplace developments, but every situation is unique. If you are facing a specific employment issue, you should consult a qualified attorney to discuss the facts of your case. While we aim to ensure the accuracy of legal interpretations at the time of publication, changes in law or policy may affect how the information applies to your circumstances. Weâre proud to stand with federal employeesâand weâre here when it matters most.
Responses