The Federal Employee Briefing for June 16, 2025
Brought to you by Southworth PC—Attorneys for Federal Employees
Our online community now tops 150,000 federal workers and supporters across TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, and LinkedIn. Each briefing distills the day’s most consequential developments, adds clear-eyed legal analysis, and pairs it with mindfulness tools that keep you steady no matter how turbulent the news cycle becomes. If this newsletter helps you stay informed, please pass it on: https://fedlegalhelp.com/newsletter. Your advocacy broadens the protective circle for every federal employee.
Top Three News Stories:
1. Judge blocks State Department plan to lay off 2,000 employees
U.S. District Judge Susan Illston ruled that Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s proposal to eliminate roughly 2,000 positions and reorganize more than 300 offices violates her May nationwide injunction against Trump-era mass reductions-in-force. Illston’s order bars the Department from issuing any RIF notices unless it first obtains permission from the court. The Justice Department has already asked the Supreme Court for emergency relief, but notices scheduled for later this month are now on hold. Anews
Legal Insight:
The order makes clear that agency-specific “re-org” claims will not defeat a broad injunction. State-Department employees who received informal warnings or “mock” retention-register rankings should preserve them; if the government eventually issues notices while the injunction stands, those actions may be void and employees can seek Back Pay Act relief. Managers must also remember that violating a court order can trigger contempt sanctions and personal liability under 28 U.S.C. § 1927. Finally, the opinion signals that any stay request filed with the Supreme Court will face questions about irreparable harm—so agencies will need solid evidence, not just budget projections, to justify layoffs.
2. Senate plan would force future hires to pay up to 14.4 percent of pay for FERS—or give up due-process rights
The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee released its draft reconciliation bill. The bill drops House language that cut current employees’ pensions, but replaces it with a two-tier system for new hires: all would pay 9.4 percent of basic pay toward FERS (more than double today’s 4.4 percent rate), and anyone who elects to keep civil-service protections would pay an extra five percentage points, for a total of 14.4 percent. The draft also imposes a $350 filing fee for Merit Systems Protection Board appeals, adds a 10 percent surcharge on automatic union-dues deductions, and requires unions to pay market rent for any office space inside federal buildings. Employee groups warn that the higher contribution rate will make government jobs uncompetitive and could destabilize the FERS trust fund over time. GovExec
Legal Insight:
For employees who do enter at the 14.4 percent tier, the mismatch between contribution and benefit may support Fifth-Amendment “takings” or equal-protection claims, similar to litigation filed over the 2013 and 2014 rate hikes. The bill’s $350 MSPB fee conflicts with 5 U.S.C. § 7701(b), which requires MSPB access “without regard to pay or amount in controversy,” and would likely be challenged under the First Amendment’s petition clause. Current employees’ rates stay unchanged, but agencies will have to revise job offers, payroll systems, and actuarial assumptions within weeks of enactment, so HR offices should begin contingency planning now.
3. Department of Veterans Affairs cancels 15 percent Special Salary Rate for nearly 10,000 HR employees
In a June 11 memorandum, VA Assistant Secretary for Human Resources Mark Engelbaum announced that the 2023 Special Salary Rate (SSR) and Critical Skills Incentive for HR specialists (GS-0201) and HR assistants (GS-0203) will end with the last FY 2025 pay period on October 4, 2025. The SSR, authorized under the PACT Act, had boosted pay by roughly 15 percent to attract talent while VA expanded benefits for toxic-exposed veterans. VA’s review found vacancies and turnover have eased, prompting management to declare the incentive “no longer necessary.” About 9,600 employees are currently covered; future hires will enter at normal General Schedule rates. VA would not say whether similar tech-workforce SSRs will also be rescinded. Federal News Network
Legal Insight:
When a Special Salary Rate is abolished, VA must likely convert each employee to the regular GS base-plus-locality schedule at the same grade and step under 5 C.F.R. 530.304 many will argue; only if that new rate falls below the former SSR does pay-retention kick in under 5 U.S.C. § 5363 and 5 C.F.R. part 536. Management’s duty to bargain with unions is limited to impact-and-implementation proposals, since ending a discretionary SSR is likely a reserved management right. Newly hired HR employees have no legal claim to the old SSR, so any recruitment shortfall is a policy, not a litigation, issue.
Mindful Moment of the Day:
“Three-Breath Transition” Between Teams Calls
Back-to-back virtual meetings leave attention residue that blurs issues and drains credibility. The antidote is fifteen seconds: mute, close your eyes, inhale to the silent word “arrive,” exhale to “engage,” and repeat for three full breaths. NIH imaging studies show this micro-reset reactivates the anterior cingulate cortex—the brain’s task-switching hub—restoring up to forty percent of lost focus. When the next meeting starts, statutes surface faster, questions land cleaner, and colleagues feel the difference even through a headset.
Legal Tip of the Day:
Security Clearance Due Process
When you receive a Statement of Reasons (SOR) proposing clearance revocation, the reply deadline—often 15 days—is tight but critical. Submit a thorough, organized response with exhibits; incomplete rebuttals rarely get second chances. You may also request a copy of the underlying investigative file under Executive Order 12968. Clearance decisions cascade into job security, so treat timelines as non‑negotiable.
Important Announcement: New RIF Appeal Resources Now Available
Before we dive into today's briefing, we want to quickly highlight new resources we've created specifically for federal employees facing Reduction-in-Force (RIF) actions. Given the challenging situation many federal workers now face, we've developed three tailored options to help you successfully appeal your RIF before the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB):
-
DIY Online Course (Bronze Level): Step-by-step video modules, proven templates, and strategic guidance to help you confidently file your own MSPB appeal. $199.
👉 Reserve Your Spot (No Payment Required Today) -
DIY Course + One-on-One Strategy Sessions (Silver Level): After enrolling in the DIY course, schedule private strategy sessions ($350/hour, up to three sessions) to personalize the course materials to your specific case.
-
Full Attorney Representation (Gold Level): Professional legal advocacy for high-stakes RIF cases, beginning with a confidential consultation ($350) to outline your strongest arguments and next steps. Retainers start at $5,000.
👉 Schedule Your RIF Strategy Consult
We designed these solutions to empower you—regardless of your budget or your case's complexity. Take action today to protect your federal career and future.
In Case You Missed It:
Today on the blog we unpack:
Live Q&A — Saturday, 11 a.m. ET
Bring your toughest workplace questions to our interactive coaching call. Free three-day trial, $19/month thereafter, cancel anytime. Members receive replays, written takeaways, and mindfulness drills that translate legal theory into daily practice. Reserve your seat: https://fedlegalhelp.com/join
Deep-Dive Courses for When the Stakes Are Personal
Navigating Reasonable Accommodations: Maximize Telework
$199 USD
Request accommodations confidently with step-by-step videos, professional templates, and mindfulness tools.
👉 Buy Now
Federal Employee RIF Masterclass: Protect Your Future
$199 USD
Secure your career during a Reduction in Force (RIF) with clear video lessons, actionable checklists, and stress-management techniques.
👉 Enroll Today
Need Personalized Advice?
A federal job moves fast—and so do the deadlines to fight discrimination, retaliation, potential discipline, or a removal. If you are interested in seeing if we can help you, one short, confidential call with Southworth PC might be able to help. The consultation is free, you speak with an attorney (not a screener), and our hybrid-retainer model caps your up-front costs until we win or settle.
We litigate before the EEOC, MSPB, and OSC nationwide, drawing on decades of inside knowledge of agency tactics. Protect your rights before the next deadline closes.
👉 Schedule Your Free Consultation Today
|
Disclaimer:
This newsletter is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. Southworth PC provides these insights to help federal employees better understand their rights and navigate workplace developments, but every situation is unique. If you are facing a specific employment issue, you should consult a qualified attorney to discuss the facts of your case. While we aim to ensure the accuracy of legal interpretations at the time of publication, changes in law or policy may affect how the information applies to your circumstances. We’re proud to stand with federal employees—and we’re here when it matters most.
Responses