The Federal Employee Briefing for July 11, 2025
Brought to you by Southworth PC—Attorneys for Federal Employees
Our online community now tops 150,000 federal workers and supporters across TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Facebook, and LinkedIn. Each briefing distills the day’s most consequential developments, adds clear-eyed legal analysis, and pairs it with mindfulness tools that keep you steady no matter how turbulent the news cycle becomes. If this newsletter helps you stay informed, please pass it on: https://fedlegalhelp.com/newsletter. Your advocacy broadens the protective circle for every federal employee.
Top Three News Stories:
1. Ninth Circuit Lets Trump’s Union-Freeze Order Move Forward—For Now
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the administration’s emergency motion to suspend a district-court injunction that had barred implementation of President Trump’s March executive order eliminating collective-bargaining rights at 21 “national-security” agencies. The panel set oral argument for July 17 but, in the meantime, agencies may resume steps such as halting dues withholding, cancelling official-time arrangements and repudiating existing contracts. Unions called the stay a “temporary setback,” while OPM said it would issue updated guidance within days. Reuters
Legal Insight:
The stay is not a merits decision; if the panel ultimately affirms the lower-court injunction, any actions taken during the gap could be rolled back with back pay. Management must still give 30 days’ notice before changing negotiated conditions of employment under 5 U.S.C. § 7116(a)(5) unless a bona-fide emergency exists. Employees who lose official-time allocations or dues deductions should document the dates and amounts for potential restitution. Filing unfair-labor-practice charges preserves rights even while the order is in force, and whistle-blower protections cover disclosures that the freeze is being misapplied.
2. Union Demands EPA Reinstate 139 Employees Suspended for Signing Dissent Letter
The American Federation of Government Employees on July 10 formally asked the Environmental Protection Agency to return 139 scientists and program analysts to duty and expunge records of their June 30 “administrative leave” placements. The employees were sidelined after endorsing a public letter criticizing deregulation moves tied to the agency’s restructuring and staff cuts. AFGE calls the suspensions illegal retaliation and says it will seek Merit Systems Protection Board relief if EPA does not act within 10 days. Reuters
Legal Insight:
Speech on matters of public health typically qualifies as protected activity under the Whistleblower Protection Act and 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8), making retaliatory suspensions reversible with back pay and possible OSC discipline for managers. Employees should preserve copies of the dissent letter, leave notices and any communications suggesting punitive motive. Union-requested status-quo-ante remedies could require EPA to reimburse lost premium pay and adjust performance ratings impacted by the absence.
3. Senate Confirms New OPM Director Amid Sweeping Workforce Changes
By a 49-46 vote on July 10, the Senate confirmed venture-capital executive Scott Kupor as Director of the Office of Personnel Management. Kupor will steer implementation of the administration’s broad civil-service overhaul, including extended probationary periods, a fast-track “suitability” removal rule and classification of a new Schedule Policy/Career hiring authority. He told senators he aims to “modernize” hiring while critics warned the agenda erodes due-process protections. Federal News Network
Legal Insight:
OPM’s director wields government-wide power to issue regulations under 5 U.S.C. § 1103; once rules are final, agencies must follow them absent court relief. Employees should monitor Federal Register notices-in-preparation, particularly on suitability removals that could shorten adverse-action timelines from 30 days to five. Unions and others can challenge such regulations under the Administrative Procedure Act, but individual employees must still meet new deadlines, so promptly consulting counsel after receiving a proposed removal is essential.
Mindful Moment of the Day:
Single-Task Sprint
For just 25 minutes today, try deep single-tasking. Choose one job—drafting a memo, reading a decision—and turn off all notifications. Each time your mind wanders, gently bring it back. This isn’t just a productivity hack—it’s mindfulness in action. Research confirms that focused attention not only gets more done, but it deepens the quality of thought—essential for legal strategy.
Legal Tip of the Day:
A Security Clearance Isn't the End—You Have Due Process Rights
Losing your clearance doesn’t have to mean losing your job—but only if you act fast and assert your rights. If you receive a Statement of Reasons (SOR) or a notice that your clearance may be suspended or revoked, you have the right to respond. You can submit evidence, witness letters, or even request a hearing depending on the agency process. Don’t try to navigate this alone. These cases are technical and fact-heavy, and a well-argued response can often make the difference between keeping your position and being walked out the door.
Important Announcement: New RIF Appeal Resources Now Available
Before we dive into today's briefing, we want to quickly highlight new resources we've created specifically for federal employees facing Reduction-in-Force (RIF) actions. Given the challenging situation many federal workers now face, we've developed three tailored options to help you successfully appeal your RIF before the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB):
-
DIY Online Course (Bronze Level): Step-by-step video modules, proven templates, and strategic guidance to help you confidently file your own MSPB appeal. $199.
👉 Reserve Your Spot (No Payment Required Today) -
DIY Course + One-on-One Strategy Sessions (Silver Level): After enrolling in the DIY course, schedule private strategy sessions ($350/hour, up to three sessions) to personalize the course materials to your specific case.
-
Full Attorney Representation (Gold Level): Professional legal advocacy for high-stakes RIF cases, beginning with a confidential consultation ($350) to outline your strongest arguments and next steps. Retainers start at $5,000.
👉 Schedule Your RIF Strategy Consult
We designed these solutions to empower you—regardless of your budget or your case's complexity. Take action today to protect your federal career and future.
In Case You Missed It:
Live Q&A — Saturday, 11 a.m. ET
Bring your toughest workplace questions to our interactive coaching call. Free three-day trial, $19/month thereafter, cancel anytime. Members receive replays, written takeaways, and mindfulness drills that translate legal theory into daily practice. Reserve your seat: https://fedlegalhelp.com/join
Deep-Dive Courses for When the Stakes Are Personal
Navigating Reasonable Accommodations: Maximize Telework
$199 USD
Request accommodations confidently with step-by-step videos, professional templates, and mindfulness tools.
👉 Buy Now
Federal Employee RIF Masterclass: Protect Your Future
$199 USD
Secure your career during a Reduction in Force (RIF) with clear video lessons, actionable checklists, and stress-management techniques.
👉 Enroll Today
Need Personalized Advice?
A federal job moves fast—and so do the deadlines to fight discrimination, retaliation, potential discipline, or a removal. If you are interested in seeing if we can help you, one short, confidential call with Southworth PC might be able to help. The consultation is free, you speak with an attorney (not a screener), and our hybrid-retainer model caps your up-front costs until we win or settle.
We litigate before the EEOC, MSPB, and OSC nationwide, drawing on decades of inside knowledge of agency tactics. Protect your rights before the next deadline closes.
👉 Schedule Your Free Consultation Today
|
Disclaimer:
This newsletter is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. Southworth PC provides these insights to help federal employees better understand their rights and navigate workplace developments, but every situation is unique. If you are facing a specific employment issue, you should consult a qualified attorney to discuss the facts of your case. While we aim to ensure the accuracy of legal interpretations at the time of publication, changes in law or policy may affect how the information applies to your circumstances. We’re proud to stand with federal employees—and we’re here when it matters most.
Responses