The Federal Employee Survival Blog

Your go-to resource for navigating job uncertainty, protecting your rights, and staying ahead of federal workplace changes. Get the latest insights on policy shifts, legal updates, discipline defense, EEO protections, and career-saving strategies—so you’re always prepared, never blindsided.

📌 Stay informed. Stay protected. Stay in control.

Supreme Court RIF Ruling Threatens Department of Education’s Future

department of education federal employment rif separation of powers supreme court Jul 15, 2025
 

In an extraordinary and troubling move, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority has allowed the Department of Education to sideline 1,378 employees—more than half its workforce—without issuing a full opinion. The unsigned one-paragraph order stayed a lower court’s reinstatement of these employees, leaving the Department hobbled during active litigation. Justice Sotomayor’s forceful 19-page dissent deserves your full attention.

 

Why This Matters to Every Federal Employee

At its core, the dissent argues that allowing a President to gut a federal agency by mass firing its personnel—while avoiding a Congressional repeal—violates the Constitution’s separation of powers. Congress created the Department of Education in 1979. Only Congress can dismantle it. But under Executive Order 14210, the Secretary of Education executed a Reduction in Force (RIF) that eliminated critical personnel with one goal: functional collapse.

The trial court, after reviewing testimony and internal records, concluded the Department could no longer fulfill statutory obligations—like processing Pell Grants, approving IEP-related funding, and enforcing civil rights in schools. In short, the agency was rendered inoperable.

 

The Precedent Is the Point

Justice Sotomayor warned that this maneuver, if left unchecked, provides a dangerous roadmap for future administrations: don’t repeal a law—just fire the staff who carry it out. As she put it, “The Take Care Clause is not the Take Apart Clause.” Presidents must execute the law, not erase it through attrition.

The threat isn’t hypothetical. If this becomes standard practice, no agency is safe. Whether it’s the EPA, VA, or Social Security Administration, a future administration could disable programs it dislikes by quietly pink-slipping civil servants. That should send chills through the federal workforce.

 

Why Mindfulness Matters in Moments Like This

As federal employees, many of you are now asking what this means for your agency, your team, and your job. I urge you: take a breath before the spiral. The power of mindfulness is not just in calming the mind, but in helping us see systems clearly. And what’s clear is that the dissent gives us a constitutional and moral framework to push back.

Read it. Share it. Ask your elected representatives to protect the law by defending the people who implement it.

And if you're one of the thousands affected by this RIF, or fear similar moves may hit your agency, our Power Hub offers in-depth legal guides and support here.

 

Legal Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. While I am a federal employment attorney, this post does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every situation is unique, and legal outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances.

THE FEDERAL EMPLOYEE BRIEFING

Your Trusted Guide in Uncertain Times

Stay informed, stay protected. The Federal Employee Briefing delivers expert insights on workforce policies, legal battles, RTO mandates, and union updates—so you’re never caught off guard. With job security, telework, and agency shifts constantly evolving, we provide clear, concise analysis on what’s happening, why it matters, and what you can do next.

📩 Get the latest updates straight to your inbox—because your career depends on it.

You're safe with me. I'll never spam you or sell your contact info.