The Federal Employee Survival Blog

Your go-to resource for navigating job uncertainty, protecting your rights, and staying ahead of federal workplace changes. Get the latest insights on policy shifts, legal updates, discipline defense, EEO protections, and career-saving strategies—so you’re always prepared, never blindsided.

📌 Stay informed. Stay protected. Stay in control.

What the McMahon v. New York Ruling Means for Federal Layoffs

federal employment mcmahon v. new york mindfulness at work reduction in force supreme court shadow docket Jul 16, 2025
 

Federal employees, especially those affected by recent RIFs at the Department of Education, are right to feel unsettled. In McMahon v. New York, the Supreme Court issued a brief, unsigned “Shadow Docket” order allowing the Department to continue mass layoffs—despite a lower court ruling that had reinstated 1,378 employees. The majority offered no reasoning. Silence, however, is never neutral.

This ruling isn’t a final decision on the legality of the layoffs. But it is a signal about how the Court may handle such challenges in the short term: allowing executive action to proceed while constitutional questions lag behind in litigation.

 

Why the Dissent Matters—and What It Means Going Forward

Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justices Kagan and Jackson, didn’t stay silent. Their 19-page dissent sharply warned that allowing mass terminations may effectively let the President dismantle federal agencies unilaterally. That’s not just administrative overreach—it strikes at the core of separation of powers.

As the dissent notes, agencies like the DOE aren’t abstract bureaucracies—they serve millions through student aid, civil rights enforcement, and special education. The gutting of these programs is not theoretical. It’s harm unfolding in real time.

Importantly, this dissent outlines a constitutional argument that future litigation can build upon. It reminds lower courts—and all of us—that just because a layoff proceeds doesn’t mean it’s lawful.

 

What Federal Employees Should Do Right Now

  1. Understand Your Status – If you’re among the DOE employees reinstated by the district court, the Supreme Court’s order means you're once again off payroll. Your case isn’t dead, but it’s paused until the courts take up the merits.

  2. Expect More RIFs – Other agencies are watching. The Court’s order may embolden them to push forward with reductions in force, even while legal uncertainties loom.

  3. Remember: This Fight Isn’t Over – The Court didn’t rule that the RIFs are legal—it simply allowed them to continue for now. The powerful dissent serves as a legal lifeline, offering hope and a framework for future challenges.

At Southworth PC, we’re tracking these developments closely and helping employees respond to each stage with clarity and purpose. If you want deeper guidance, you can explore our Power Hub resources for federal workers navigating layoffs, appeals, and more.

 

Legal Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. While I am a federal employment attorney, this post does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every situation is unique, and legal outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances.

THE FEDERAL EMPLOYEE BRIEFING

Your Trusted Guide in Uncertain Times

Stay informed, stay protected. The Federal Employee Briefing delivers expert insights on workforce policies, legal battles, RTO mandates, and union updates—so you’re never caught off guard. With job security, telework, and agency shifts constantly evolving, we provide clear, concise analysis on what’s happening, why it matters, and what you can do next.

📩 Get the latest updates straight to your inbox—because your career depends on it.

You're safe with me. I'll never spam you or sell your contact info.