The Federal Employee Survival Blog

Your go-to resource for navigating job uncertainty, protecting your rights, and staying ahead of federal workplace changes. Get the latest insights on policy shifts, legal updates, discipline defense, EEO protections, and career-saving strategies—so you’re always prepared, never blindsided.

📌 Stay informed. Stay protected. Stay in control.

Footnote 10: What SCOTUS’s Injunction Ruling Means for Federal RIFs

administrative procedure act federal employment nationwide injunctions rif notices supreme court rulings Jun 27, 2025
 

Today, while training to better serve federal employees, I received powerful news: our team secured a unanimous six-figure jury verdict for a client in federal court. From starting this firm solo to seeing over 20 dedicated professionals champion life-changing results for federal workers, these moments anchor us – and remind me why clarity on legal shifts like today’s Supreme Court decision matters so deeply.

 

Supreme Court Clips Nationwide Injunction Power

In Trump v. Castro, the Supreme Court limited judges’ authority to issue broad, nationwide injunctions. Practically, this means courts may no longer block a federal policy across the entire country with a single ruling unless Congress clearly authorized it. For federal employees watching looming reduction-in-force (RIF) notices, this change raised alarms: if courts can’t freeze mass agency actions, do your protections evaporate overnight?

 

The Quiet Power of Footnote 10

Here’s where Footnote 10 comes in. Justice Barrett wrote that the ruling does not decide whether the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) lets courts “vacate” agency actions altogether. In plain English, even if broad injunctions are reined in, courts may still halt agency plans for everyone by vacating them under the APA.

For federal employees facing RIFs, this distinction is critical. If a judge vacates an agency action under the APA, that ruling generally stops the action in full, not merely for individual plaintiffs. While legal minds will debate the contours of Footnote 10, it signals that courts retain meaningful tools to check agency overreach.

 

Mindful Takeaway: Prepare for Loss and Victory

What does this mean for you today? First, hope remains alive. This decision did not strip all protections against mass layoffs or harmful agency actions. The legal landscape is still in flux – a “jump ball,” as we say. Mindfully, prepare your internal landscape for both outcomes:

  • If the ruling goes against employees, you will still have paths to appeal, challenge notices, or pivot strategically.

  • If it favors employees, your protections continue under existing freezes or vacaturs.

In either scenario, your centered awareness is your first defense. Take a walk this evening, breathe deeply, and remember: rulings affect your job, but they do not define your worth or agency in responding.

We expect further decisions in the coming week, possibly as soon as Monday. Stay tuned for updates.

 

Legal Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. While I am a federal employment attorney, this post does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every situation is unique, and legal outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances.

THE FEDERAL EMPLOYEE BRIEFING

Your Trusted Guide in Uncertain Times

Stay informed, stay protected. The Federal Employee Briefing delivers expert insights on workforce policies, legal battles, RTO mandates, and union updates—so you’re never caught off guard. With job security, telework, and agency shifts constantly evolving, we provide clear, concise analysis on what’s happening, why it matters, and what you can do next.

📩 Get the latest updates straight to your inbox—because your career depends on it.

You're safe with me. I'll never spam you or sell your contact info.