The Federal Employee Survival Blog

Your go-to resource for navigating job uncertainty, protecting your rights, and staying ahead of federal workplace changes. Get the latest insights on policy shifts, legal updates, discipline defense, EEO protections, and career-saving strategies—so you’re always prepared, never blindsided.

📌 Stay informed. Stay protected. Stay in control.

Court Rules Trump’s IG Firings Were Unlawful

due process federal employment inspectors general mindfulness at work mspb appeals Sep 25, 2025
 

A federal judge recently found that former President Trump unlawfully removed 17 Inspectors General (IGs). By law, the President must give Congress 30 days’ notice and provide a specific reason before firing an IG. In these cases, that step was skipped. The judge called the violation “obvious.”

Still, the court stopped short of reinstating the fired officials. Why? Because even if it ordered them back, a president could simply redo the process correctly a month later. Some IG posts are already filled by Senate-confirmed replacements. The takeaway isn’t about putting individuals back in seats—it’s about reaffirming that the rules apply to everyone, even presidents.

Process Protects More Than Watchdogs

For federal employees, the ruling is about more than inspectors general. It’s a reminder that in the civil service, process is protection. Whether it’s a proposed suspension, a performance improvement plan, or a removal, agencies must follow specific procedures. Skipping steps, ignoring notice requirements, or failing to provide reasons isn’t just unfair—it’s unlawful.

Just as Congress was entitled to notice in the IG cases, you are entitled to notice in your own. Due process is not optional. When agencies shortcut procedure, employees have the right to challenge it, often successfully, at the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) or through grievance processes.

Independence vs. Political Control

The ruling also raises a bigger question: how independent should watchdogs be? If IGs can be fired too easily, their oversight may be chilled. If they’re too insulated, presidents may feel handcuffed in shaping their leadership team. This tension isn’t new—but the case underscores that Congress deliberately built in guardrails to balance accountability with independence.

Federal employees should see this as a signal: your statutory protections serve the same purpose. They keep public service from being a political free-for-all. They create stability in your career, so you can focus on the mission without fear that each election cycle brings arbitrary dismissals.

Mindful Takeaway

When legal news like this breaks, it can feel like just another headline. But the mindful perspective is this: rules and safeguards are there to create steadiness in turbulent times. For you, that means when an agency moves against you—whether through discipline, reassignment, or even a RIF—the question isn’t “do they have the power?” but “are they following the process?” That shift in perspective can bring calm, and it’s often the key to mounting a successful defense.

 

 

Legal Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. While I am a federal employment attorney, this post does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every situation is unique, and legal outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances.

THE FEDERAL EMPLOYEE BRIEFING

Your Trusted Guide in Uncertain Times

Stay informed, stay protected. The Federal Employee Briefing delivers expert insights on workforce policies, legal battles, RTO mandates, and union updates—so you’re never caught off guard. With job security, telework, and agency shifts constantly evolving, we provide clear, concise analysis on what’s happening, why it matters, and what you can do next.

📩 Get the latest updates straight to your inbox—because your career depends on it.

You're safe with me. I'll never spam you or sell your contact info.