The Federal Employee Survival Blog

Your go-to resource for navigating job uncertainty, protecting your rights, and staying ahead of federal workplace changes. Get the latest insights on policy shifts, legal updates, discipline defense, EEO protections, and career-saving strategies—so you’re always prepared, never blindsided.

📌 Stay informed. Stay protected. Stay in control.

Hidden OMB “Spend Plans” and Risks for Federal Staff

anti-deficiency act budget officers federal employment mindfulness at work omb apportionments Sep 24, 2025

In recent weeks, watchdog groups have revealed a troubling development at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Although a federal court ordered OMB to restore its public apportionments website, the agency has been attaching legally binding footnotes to appropriations. These footnotes make agency funds available only if the agency follows a “spend plan” that is not posted publicly.

For career federal employees, this is more than a technical budget dispute. Apportionments dictate when and how you can obligate funds. If a hidden plan restricts spending but you only see the public document, you may unknowingly risk violating the Anti-Deficiency Act.

What This Looks Like in Practice

According to Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), more than one hundred apportionments since March have included these opaque footnotes. One example: on June 10, the State Department Inspector General was apportioned roughly $27 million—but only if it complied with a non-public spend plan. That means the document visible to the public suggested funds were available, but the true conditions remained hidden.

This discrepancy creates uncertainty not just for agency leadership, but for line employees handling contracts, grants, hiring, or travel approvals. When the rules are unclear, those carrying out day-to-day mission work become the ones left holding the liability.

The Legal and Professional Risks

For budget officers, contracting officials, and program staff, this lack of transparency poses real risks:

Anti-Deficiency Act exposure. Obligating funds without knowledge of hidden restrictions could be viewed as a violation.
Oversight blind spots. Inspectors General, GAO, and Congress rely on public apportionments. If the true rules are buried, accountability suffers.
Mission delays. Training schedules, hiring timelines, and grant obligations can be thrown off by “invisible” timing gates.

A Mindful Way Forward

This situation can understandably raise anxiety. Remember: the burden should not fall on you alone. If you’re in a position where apportionments affect your work, request written confirmation from your budget office or counsel on whether any spend plan conditions apply. Put your questions in writing, so you have a record of seeking clarity.

From a mindfulness perspective, it helps to recognize the limits of your control. You cannot force OMB to publish its plans, but you can protect yourself by documenting requests, escalating ambiguities, and leaning on professional networks for updates. Doing so turns uncertainty into a shared responsibility, not a personal fault line.

Legal Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. While I am a federal employment attorney, this post does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every situation is unique, and legal outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances.

THE FEDERAL EMPLOYEE BRIEFING

Your Trusted Guide in Uncertain Times

Stay informed, stay protected. The Federal Employee Briefing delivers expert insights on workforce policies, legal battles, RTO mandates, and union updates—so you’re never caught off guard. With job security, telework, and agency shifts constantly evolving, we provide clear, concise analysis on what’s happening, why it matters, and what you can do next.

📩 Get the latest updates straight to your inbox—because your career depends on it.

You're safe with me. I'll never spam you or sell your contact info.