The Federal Employee Survival Blog

Your go-to resource for navigating job uncertainty, protecting your rights, and staying ahead of federal workplace changes. Get the latest insights on policy shifts, legal updates, discipline defense, EEO protections, and career-saving strategies—so you’re always prepared, never blindsided.

📌 Stay informed. Stay protected. Stay in control.

RIF Litigation Update: Three Cases Every Federal Employee Must Watch

federal employment mindfulness at work mspb appeals opm authority rif litigation Sep 09, 2025
 

Federal employees across agencies are facing reductions in force (RIFs) at an unprecedented pace. While some layoffs have already gone forward, the courts are still weighing critical legal questions. The outcomes will determine whether these cuts stick—or whether relief may come for employees who have already lost their jobs.

Here are the three cases shaping the future of federal employment.

Case One: OPM v. AFGE

At issue: OPM directed mass terminations of probationary employees—over 16,000 people across VA, Agriculture, and Defense. A district court said OPM overstepped, but the Supreme Court temporarily paused that ruling. The current question is whether unions even have standing to challenge OPM’s actions.

Takeaway: For now, agencies—not OPM—control whether to terminate probationary staff. Employees should monitor agency-specific policies closely, as each department may respond differently while the appeal is pending.

Case Two: Trump v. AFGE

This case challenges an executive order directing mass layoffs at 22 agencies. A trial judge blocked implementation, but the Supreme Court allowed the administration to proceed while the case plays out. Importantly, the judge has required disclosure of internal RIF plans, despite the government’s attempt to dismiss the lawsuit.

Takeaway: September 12 marks a pivotal hearing. If the case survives dismissal, employees could see detailed RIF strategies surface in discovery—giving unions and individuals critical insight into what’s ahead.

Case Three: McMahon v. New York

Here, the Department of Education sought to cut nearly 1,400 employees. A judge initially blocked the move, but the Supreme Court lifted the injunction, permitting the layoffs. In dissent, three justices raised a fundamental concern: can a president dismantle a congressionally created department through workforce reductions?

Takeaway: Litigation continues this fall, with appeals and district court proceedings both moving forward. For Education employees especially, the stakes extend beyond jobs—they touch the very structure of the department.

Reading the Broader Signals

Across all three cases, the Supreme Court has sided with the administration in emergency rulings, letting layoffs proceed for now. But these are not final judgments. Lower courts are still actively examining whether OPM exceeded its authority, whether unions may sue, and how far executive power stretches.

For federal employees, the uncertainty is daunting. A mindful approach—focusing on what you can control today—helps calm the anxiety of waiting for courts to act. Stay attentive to agency communications, and keep informed on these cases.

 

Legal Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. While I am a federal employment attorney, this post does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every situation is unique, and legal outcomes depend on specific facts and circumstances.

THE FEDERAL EMPLOYEE BRIEFING

Your Trusted Guide in Uncertain Times

Stay informed, stay protected. The Federal Employee Briefing delivers expert insights on workforce policies, legal battles, RTO mandates, and union updates—so you’re never caught off guard. With job security, telework, and agency shifts constantly evolving, we provide clear, concise analysis on what’s happening, why it matters, and what you can do next.

📩 Get the latest updates straight to your inbox—because your career depends on it.

You're safe with me. I'll never spam you or sell your contact info.