The Federal Employee Survival Blog

Your go-to resource for navigating job uncertainty, protecting your rights, and staying ahead of federal workplace changes. Get the latest insights on policy shifts, legal updates, discipline defense, EEO protections, and career-saving strategies—so you’re always prepared, never blindsided.

📌 Stay informed. Stay protected. Stay in control.

The Federal Circuit Will Decide How Far “Article II Firings” Can Go

adverse actions article ii firings chapter 75 federal circuit mspb Jul 13, 2026

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has agreed to hear, en banc, a case that could decide how far federal agencies can go in removing career employees without the protections Congress wrote into Title 5.

What Happened to Judges Jackler and Jaroch

In February 2025, two career immigration judges, Megan Jackler and Brandon Jaroch, both military veterans, were removed without notice, cause, or a chance to respond. The government's position: Article II of the Constitution lets the President remove certain officials at will, and that authority overrides the removal protections written into Title 5.

The MSPB Stepped Back, Not In

In March 2026, the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) reviewed the case and, rather than ruling on the merits, relinquished jurisdiction — meaning it declined to decide the case at all, reasoning that certain non-policymaking “inferior officers” may be removed at will. That posture matters as much as any outcome: once an agency invokes Article II and labels an employee an “inferior officer,” the board that normally hears removal appeals may decline to review the case at all.

Why the Full Federal Circuit Is Taking This Case

In June 2026, the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit — every active judge sitting together, known as en banc — agreed to hear the appeal. En banc review is reserved for cases of exceptional importance, signaling how significant the court considers this removal question. Under the court's briefing schedule, the fired judges' opening brief is due July 14, 2026, with the government's response to follow and oral argument expected later this year.

What This Means for Federal Employees Right Now

Nothing changes for your rights today. Employees removed through the ordinary process keep their statutory protections under 5 U.S.C. § 7513 unless and until a court rules otherwise. The administration has already applied the same Article II rationale to other employees, so this case could determine whether that theory has a ceiling. Because the MSPB relinquished jurisdiction rather than deciding the merits, the central legal question is whether the Constitution allows an agency to sidestep the cause-and-procedure protections in Title 5 simply by reclassifying an employee.

If your agency has invoked, or threatened to invoke, at-will removal authority outside the normal adverse-action process, the details of how that decision was framed matter. Southworth PC represents federal employees nationwide, including in matters involving MSPB jurisdiction and removal appeals, and offers free consultations.

Legal Disclaimer: This content is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Federal employment situations are fact-specific and time-sensitive. Please consult a qualified federal employment attorney about your specific situation.

THE FEDERAL EMPLOYEE BRIEFING

Your Trusted Guide in Uncertain Times

Stay informed, stay protected. The Federal Employee Briefing delivers expert insights on workforce policies, legal battles, RTO mandates, and union updates—so you’re never caught off guard. With job security, telework, and agency shifts constantly evolving, we provide clear, concise analysis on what’s happening, why it matters, and what you can do next.

📩 Get the latest updates straight to your inbox—because your career depends on it.

You're safe with me. I'll never spam you or sell your contact info.